Parallel Python
Home arrow Forum arrow Python Forums arrow Python Forum arrow Parallel Python is better than multiprocessing package in 2.6 python
Is your Python knowledge up to date? Shop for Python books on Amazon.
Parallel Python Community Forums rss  
October 04, 2015, 02:16:54 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Parallel python forum is up and running!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Parallel Python is better than multiprocessing package in 2.6 python  (Read 26783 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
New Python

Karma: 0
Posts: 1

View Profile
« on: January 19, 2009, 06:53:16 AM »

I want to congratulate parallel python developers, because PP works in a very perfomance-predictable way.
And multiprocessing package - does not (in python2.6)-
How it can be that multiprocessing package is so buggy, i.e. parallel version of iterations runs about 5 times !!! slower than normal sequential iterations.
And your PP package behaves in predictable way (speeds-up process by a factor=number of cores).
Global Moderator
Parallel Python

Karma: 2
Posts: 520

View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2009, 09:10:13 PM »

However, the issue in that bug is with a too small level of granularity.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 12:51:33 AM by Vitalii » Logged

Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Nutrition facts and analysis